R v Briggs-Price - JustCite - the legal search engine and citator

Title

The title of the Act or Statutory Instrument. Show example

Reference

The number of the Act or Statutory Instrument. Show example

Year to

The year in which the legislation was published in print. Show example

Repealed

All In Force Repealed

Restrict your search to legislation that is either in force or repealed.

This field is only compatible with UK primary legislation.
Using this field will exclude all other legislation from your results.

Commencement

All Commenced Part Prospective Prospective

Restrict your search to legislation that Commenced, Part Prospective or Prospective

This field is only compatible with UK primary legislation from 2001 - present.
Using this field will exclude all other legislation from your results.

Name

The name of the barrister. Show example

Status

No Preference QC Only Junior Only

Restrict your search to a barrister that is either a QC or is not a QC.

Areas of Practice

The areas of practice of the barrister. Show example

Year of Call to

The year called to the Bar. Show example

Region

The address of the barrister's chambers. Show example

Languages

Languages the barrister can speak. Show example

Access & Fees

Licensed Access Accepted Conditional Fees Accepted

Restrict your search to barristers that accept conditional fees or licensed access.

Searching:

Acts
SIs
Civil Procedure Rules
Bills before Parliament

Searching:

Official Journal C
OJC Documents (in CELEX)
EU Cases
EU Legislation
EU Treaties
EU Proposals
EU Nat. Implementation
EU Parl. Questions
EFTA Documents
EU External Agreements
OJ Daily
Human Rights Conventions

Searching:

HERMES
Times
EU News and Commentaries
CUP Journals
Bills before Parliament
Other Articles
PLC
OUP Journals
Blackwell Journals
RMIT Journals
Court Forms

R v Briggs-Price

To see all the information available for this document you will need to Sign In.

Justis Editorial on 30 August 2011

Confiscation order where not all drug trafficking charged

The House of Lords handed down judgment in the case of R v Briggs-Price 30/04/2009 Times Law Reports on 29th April 2009. The case concerned an appeal against a confiscation order made by the trial judge under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 c. 37. The trial judge had accepted the prosecution’s contention that drug trafficking offences, other than those the appellant had been convicted of, had been committed. Accordingly a confiscation order reflecting this was made.

The House considered section 4 of the 1994 Act and case law such as Geerings v The Netherlands (2008) 46 EHRR 49. Dismissing the appeal, the House held that the Geerings case could be distinguished and the requirements of article 6.1, as incorporated by schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 c. 42, had been met.

database/2012-05-17T21:16:01.7386840Z/6703902

JustCite is a legal search engine and citator that shows you how cases, legislation and other legal materials cite and relate to each other.