Searching:
  • Acts
  • SIs
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Bills before Parliament
Searching:
  • Official Journal C
  • OJC Documents (in CELEX)
  • EU Cases
  • EU Legislation
  • EU Treaties
  • EU Proposals
  • EU Nat. Implementation
  • EU Parl. Questions
  • EFTA Documents
  • EU External Agreements
  • OJ Daily
  • Human Rights Conventions
Searching:
  • HERMES
  • Times
  • EU News and Commentaries
  • CUP Journals
  • Bills before Parliament
  • Other Articles
  • PLC
  • OUP Journals
  • Blackwell Journals
  • RMIT Journals
  • Court Forms
close
Misick and others (Appellants) v The Queen (Respondent) (Turks and Caicos)
To see all the information available for this document you will need to Sign In.

1 User Commentary

Melanie Davidson (In-house lawyer) 28 September 2015

Case Digest: Misick and others (Appellants) v The Queen (Respondent) (Turks and Caicos) [2015] UKPC 31

0 reviews Your rating:

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council handed down its judgment on 25 June 2015 in Misick and others (Appellants) v The Queen (Respondent) (Turks and Caicos) [2015] UKPC 31 before Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson.

The appellants faced prosecution in the Turks and Caicos Islands for offences of conspiracy to accept bribes in public office, conspiracy to defraud and associated money laundering.This led to the partial suspension of the Constitution along with the right to trial by jury by the British government.

Two challenges arose in the trial:

i) The trial judge lack sufficient length of appointment to demonstrate proper judicial independence.

ii) The trial judge applied the wrong approach when he decided that trial by judge alone was required.

In a judgment given prepared by Lord Hughes, the board agreed that Harrison J was appointed ad hoc and selected from a jurisdiction outside of the island, to ensure that judicial independence was exercised. Trial by jury alone was necessary in the “interests of justice” due to the fact that it would be difficult to assemble an unbiased jury, who would not have a prior knowledge or comments about the trial.

The appeal was dismissed.

database/2017-12-14T02:44:37.8404696Z/10642057

Getting the most out of


JustCite is a one-of-its-kind legal research tool that shows you how materials cite and relate to each other. It has an enormous index of information about legal documents and where to find them, but does not contain the documents themselves.

Justis is our full-text online legal library, with an ever-growing range of primary and specialist law reports, judgments and legislation from the UK, Ireland, EU, Australia and Canada.

Register for a Free Trial
Get started with Justis and JustCite now