|
Searching:
Searching:
Searching:
|
|
|
Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art Ltd (C-167/01) - 2003 Establishment— Arts 43, 46 and 48 EC—company formed in one Member State and carrying on activities in another Member State—application of company law of Member State of establishment intended to protect interests of others—ECJ procedure—admissibility of reference—national law imp... Show moreEstablishment— Arts 43, 46 and 48 EC—company formed in one Member State and carrying on activities in another Member State—application of company law of Member State of establishment intended to protect interests of others—ECJ procedure—admissibility of reference—national law implementing company directives—no restriction on freedom of establishment—sanctions for breach of directives—required by Art.10 EC to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive—exhaustive nature of disclosure requirements in Eleventh Company Directive ( Directive 89/666 )—national legislation outside scope of directives—scope of Arts 43 and 48 EC—no abuse in taking advantage of differences in company laws—inherent in concept of single market—national law on minimum capital requirements as restriction on freedom of establishment—Daily Mail distinguished—public interest criteria—no justification on grounds of protection of creditors or prevention of improper recourse to freedom of establishment. [2003] ECR I-10155 Case
Treatments:
1 positive
8 neutral
| Recent:
Referred to by
Proceedings concerning Polbud—Wykonawstwo sp z o o (CJEU)
|
|
|
EUROPEAN COURT REPORTS 2006 PAGE I-04601 62004CJ0509 EU Case |
|
|
EUROPEAN COURT REPORTS 2006 PAGE I-04601 62004CC0509 EU Case |
|
|
OJ C 165, 15/07/2006 P. 0009 C2006N0165(15) EU - OJC |
|
|
Inconsistencies that have been identified during the transposition phase of the Capital Requirements Directives need to be addressed to ensure that the effectiveness of the underlying goals of the Directive is not compromised. COM(2008) 602 final EU |
|
|
Concerns the distinguishing capital letters of Member States to be used for the EEC initial verification mark affixed on a measuring instrument and indicating that the latter conforms to the EEC requirements. 2007/13/EC EU |
|
|
52009PC0362 EU Proposal |
|
|
52009SC0974 EU Proposal |
|
|
52009SC0975 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 291, 01/12/2009 P. 0001 52009AB0094 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 045E, 23/02/2010 P. 0015 52008IP0607 EU Proposal |
|
|
I (Resolutions, recommendations and opinions) OPINIONS EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK (2009/C 291/01) EU - OJC |
|
|
BANKING - Capital Requirements Directive - Economic cycle COM(2010) 327 final EU Commentary |
|
|
OJ C 223, 18/08/2010 P. 0001 52010AB0065
|
|
|
Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, May 2009: 224-227 RMIT ref 066321412512089 Article |
|
|
OJ C 339, 14/12/2010 P. 0024 52010AE0098
|
|
|
OJ L 329, 14/12/2010 P. 0003 32010L0076
|
|
|
72010L0076
|
|
|
OJ C 351E, 02/12/2011 P. 0446 52010AP0274
|
|
|
OJ C 371E, 20/12/2011 P. 0022 52010IP0354
|
|
|
Banks - Capital requirements - Economic cycle COM(2012) 400 final EU Commentary |
|
|
OJ L 100, 03/04/2014, P. 0001 - 2014 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 342/2014 of 21 January 2014 supplementing Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the... Show moreCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 342/2014 of 21 January 2014 supplementing Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of the calculation methods of capital adequacy requirements for financial conglomerates Text with EEA relevance 32014R0342
|
|
|
52019PC0039
|
|
|
OJ L 082, 25/03/2019, P. 0008 32019D0483
|
|
- 1 of 1