|
Searching:
Searching:
Searching:
|
|
|
Merger control Proposal for the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - 1996 OJ C 376, 12/12/1996 P. 0008 C1996N0376(04) EU - OJC |
|
|
OJ L 050, 23/02/2005 P. 0010 32005D0152 EU Legislation |
|
|
OJ L 024, 29/01/2004 P. 0001 32004R0139 EU Legislation |
|
|
OJ L 091, 30/03/2004 P. 0040 32004D0285 EU Legislation |
|
|
OJ L 004, 09/01/2001 P. 0031 32001D0016 EU Legislation |
|
|
OJ C 010, 14/01/2004 P. 0029 52003AE1169 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 020, 28/01/2003 P. 0004 52002PC0711 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 362, 02/12/1996 P. 0145 51996IP0339 EU Proposal |
|
|
51996DC0019 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 056, 24/02/1997 P. 0071 51996AC1266 EU Proposal |
|
|
51993DC0385 EU Proposal |
|
|
OJ C 036, 12/02/1982 P. 0003 51981PC0773 EU Proposal |
|
|
II (Preparatory Acts) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE (2004/C 10/10) EU - OJC |
|
|
II (Preparatory Acts) COMMISSION (2003/C 20/06) EU - OJC |
|
|
Merger control Proposal for the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - 1996 I (Information) COMMISSION (1996/C 376/04) EU - OJC |
|
|
II (Preparatory Acts) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE (1997/C 56/13) EU - OJC |
|
|
Proposal for a Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings - 2002 Reviews and amends the Merger Regulation (4064/89) in line with Green Paper on this subject (COM(2001) 745 final). COM(2002) 711 final EU |
|
|
Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) - 2004 Replaces Regulations 4064/89 and 1310/97 and comes into effect on May 1, 2004. 139/2004 EU |
|
|
Imposes a fine of €35,000 on Deutsche BP AG. 2004/285/EC EU |
|
|
A fine of €40,000 is imposed on Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM) for having supplied incorrect and misleading information to the Commission with regard to a merger. 2005/152/EC EU |
|
|
Report European Commission Merger control COM(2009) 281 final EU Commentary |
|
|
Aer Lingus Group Plc v Commission of the European Communities (Case T-411/07 R) - 2008 Anti-competitive practices—concentrations—interim measures—prohibition of notified merger by Commission—annulment action by notifying party, R, pending before CFI—application to Commission by target company seeking adoption of measures under art.8(4) of Regulation 139/2004 requir... Show moreAnti-competitive practices—concentrations—interim measures—prohibition of notified merger by Commission—annulment action by notifying party, R, pending before CFI—application to Commission by target company seeking adoption of measures under art.8(4) of Regulation 139/2004 requiring R to divest non-controlling minority shareholding in target company—also seeking adoption of interim measures under art.8(5) of Regulation 139/2004 to prevent R from exercising voting rights in target company—refusal by Commission to adopt requested measures—annulment action challenging Commission's refusal decision—applicant seeking interim measures pending main action—R granted leave to intervene—legal principles regarding interim measures—duration—only capable of being granted until judgment in main action—suspension of operation of negative administrative decision not possible—orders sought by applicant incompatible with distribution of powers between Community institutions—Commission discretion when adopting measures necessary to comply with decision of Community Courts—admissibility of general request for “any such order as Court may think fit”—interim measures capable of being imposed on third parties in certain circumstances—admissibility of request for interim measures against intervener notwithstanding possible impact on other shareholders—prima facie case—definition of “implemented” in art.8 of Regulation 139/2004 —English term “implemented” open to different meanings—reference made to other official language versions—“implemented” denoting full consummation of transaction and acquisition of control—thus failure by applicant to establish prima facie case—previous Commission practice regarding partial implementation not conclusive—Commission case law on retention of minority shareholdings irrelevant—possible application of national competition law to non-controlling minority shareholding—no prima facie case regarding alleged regulatory lacuna in Regulation 139/2004 —possibility of applying arts 81 and 82 EC to minority shareholdings—urgency of need for interim measures—whether applicant had established need to prevent serious and irreparable damage—no sufficiently concrete evidence of damage—purely pecuniary damage not regarded as irreparable except in exceptional circumstances—no prima facie case—no imminent risk of serious and irreparable harm—application dismissed. [2008] ECR II-411 Case |
|
|
Merger control regulation: a hard ride - 1988 NEW LAW JOURNAL 138 NLJ 447
|
|
|
The EEC merger regulation – M & A control moves to Brussels - 1990 NEW LAW JOURNAL 140 NLJ 844
|
|
|
OJ C 081E, 31/03/2004 P. 0094 52003AP0428
|
|
- 1 2 of 2